http://frankhecker.com/2006/08/27/emusic-pricing-part-1-goldilocks-and-the-three-plans/ Trying to unite civility and truth in a few long blog posts Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:03:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://frankhecker.com/2006/08/27/emusic-pricing-part-1-goldilocks-and-the-three-plans/#comment-1079 Tue, 02 Jun 2009 04:43:59 +0000 http://swindleeeee.wordpress.com/2006/08/27/emusic-pricing-part-1-goldilocks-and-the-three-plans/#comment-1079 [...] only three options (Basic, Plus, and Premium), eMusic has reverted to a more straightforward Goldilocks pricing strategy, with the eMusic Plus plan presumably the one eMusic would like most subscribers to [...]

]]> http://frankhecker.com/2006/08/27/emusic-pricing-part-1-goldilocks-and-the-three-plans/#comment-1078 Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:59:33 +0000 http://swindleeeee.wordpress.com/2006/08/27/emusic-pricing-part-1-goldilocks-and-the-three-plans/#comment-1078 [...] This is the second in a series of posts about eMusic’s pricing strategy. (See also part 1.) In this post I discuss the possible motivations behind eMusic’s price points for the various subscription plans and booster packs, and including selection of the price points and the spacing between them, selection of per-track prices, and the use of “.99″ prices. [...]

]]>