Here’s a weird one, perhaps even weirder than the eMusic deal with Westin Hotels: “Johnny Rockets Expands Music Initiative with Local Market Campaign.” For those who aren’t familiar with it, Johnny Rockets is a faux-retro hamburger chain, and now an eMusic business partner: Johnny Rockets will be expanding its branded music to bring the classic Johnny Rockets music experience to consumers and music fans in new ways. ...

My apologies for not posting in recent days; work has taken precedence. Here are two quick items to help fill the void for now: First, Pioneers of the Inevitable, the folks behind the open source media player Songbird, have just gotten $1M in venture funding. They’re also about to release version 0.2, but you knew that already, right? Second, since this is Swindleeeee!!!!! we have to have an eMusic tie-in, and fortunately Erik Staats came through for us, announcing his new eMusic extension for Songbird. The extension eliminates the most annoying (at least to me) feature of the eMusic web site, namely that listening to the 30-second track samples requires launching an external application (in my case iTunes for OS X). The extension still has a few rough spots (as noted in my posts to the eMusic message board thread linked to earlier), but it’s definitely full of promise. ...

This is my report on activities of the Mozilla Foundation for the week ending September 29, 2006. Projects for the week Here’s a partial listing of what I and others at the Foundation did this past week: IP-related issues. I corresponded with Daniel Glazman about the naming of his proposed successor product to Mozilla Composer and Nvu, and agreed to help him with trademark-related issues as appropriate. I also got some paperwork completed relating to the trademark application for the SeaMonkey logo, and will be proceeding with that. ...

This is my report on activities of the Mozilla Foundation for the week ending September 22, 2006. Projects for the week Here’s a partial listing of what I and others at the Foundation did this past week: Grants and related topics. I concluded arrangements for a Foundation grant to Seneca College (of Toronto Canada) to support their Mozilla-related activities; you can read more about these activities on David Humphrey’s blog. Next action(s): Sort out administrative arrangements for one more project we’re planning to fund. ...

Harald Walker wrote me to note that eMusic seems to have changed its past policies regarding how it treats departing subscribers: Maybe something new from eMusic. As far as I know it has been possible in the past to stop the paid subscription for a while and activate it many months later without loosing your account data, which is important if you have to download tracks again (if eMusic still has them) and if you want to keep your lists. . . . ...

Yesterday I happened to read a blog post from Paul Kedrovsky containing some sage advice for companies competing in new markets: “declare victory early and often.” To quote him: Many markets are tippy—they want there to be a market leader—so you can self-servingly help things along by declaring your firm to be the chosen one. It strikes me that that is what eMusic has been trying to do, and with some success. Of course eMusic can’t declare itself to be the overall market leader in digital music—that title being reserved for Apple—but what eMusic has done is to unilaterally declare itself to be “the world’s largest digital retailer of independent music” and (more important) number two behind Apple in the overall digital music market, outpacing Napster, Rhapsody, and the rest. Some interesting points about this strategy: ...

In a comment to his blog post “The strange world of digital music,” Nicholas Carr acknowledges the role that Apple’s proprietary DRM scheme has played in fending off competitors to the iPod, but opines that, “There’s no reason that you couldn’t have a single DRM standard.” Well, yes, and there’s no reason in theory that you couldn’t have a single OS standard. However DRM schemes, like operating systems, are choke points for the respective markets of digital music and IT, and in each case companies are highly motivated to pursue proprietary approaches in the hope that they’ll be the market winners and reap the benefits thereof, including in particular the ability to extract the major portion of the value in that market. Microsoft won that jackpot in IT, and so far Apple has done so in digital music. ...

This is my report on activities of the Mozilla Foundation for the week ending September 15, 2006. Projects for the week Here’s a partial listing of what I and others at the Foundation did this past week: Grants and related topics. I concluded arrangements for the Foundation to fund Henri Sivonen to develop an HTML5 conformance checker prototype, based on existing work he’s done in this area. I also approved a grant to Knowbility Inc. for Mozilla accessibility developer travel expenses and general sponsorship of the Second 2006 California Web Accessibility Conference (CalWAC2) at the California State University at Long Beach on September 28–29. ...

I was on vacation for the week ending September 8, 2006, so there was very little to report; see my status report for the week ending September 15, 2006.

In the flood of press articles on Microsoft’s recent Zune announcement, I happened to take special note of one that appeared in The Register, titled “The iPod’s Achilles Heel? It’s er. . . Reader’s Digest.” The logic of the article appears to be as follows: Apple doesn’t offer a subscription service for the iPod. eMusic has built a successful digital music business on a subscription model. Microsoft will offer a subscription service for Zune. Therefore Zune will have a competitive advantage against the iPod. Unfortunately the article’s logic breaks down when you look at it closely. Let’s start with the confusion about what the eMusic subscription model actually entails, especially compared to other subscription-based services like Napster To Go. The article refers to eMusic’s “‘Reader’s Digest’ subscription model,” but doesn’t really explain the reference; I’m assuming that the article is using the phrase “‘Reader’s Digest’ subscription model” as shorthand for any model where people pay fixed amounts at set periods for content of some sort (magazines, music, whatever). However an eMusic subscription is very different than a Napster To Go subscription: ...