Math Academy, part 7: Technology brief

I look what the technical underpinnings of the Math Academy system.

2025-02-14 · 18 min · Frank Hecker

Math Academy, part 6: Customer responsibilities

I look what Math Academy students and anyone responsible for them needs to provide in the way of coaching.

2025-02-13 · 3 min · Frank Hecker

Math Academy, part 5: Product features

I look at the technical feautures of the Math Academy system as touted by its creators.

2025-02-12 · 16 min · Frank Hecker

Math Academy, part 4: Addressing objections

I look at various objections Math Academy prospects might have, and how they can supposedly be addressed.

2025-02-11 · 7 min · Frank Hecker

Math Academy, part 3: The sales pitch

I try to figure out what Math Academy is selling and why anyone should buy it.

2025-02-10 · 10 min · Frank Hecker

Math Academy, part 2: A skeptical prospect

I start my exploration of Math Academy with a jaundiced view of its prospects.

2025-02-09 · 7 min · Frank Hecker

Math Academy, part 1: My eigenvector embarassment

I start a series of posts on Math Academy and its system for learning mathematics.

2025-02-08 · 4 min · Frank Hecker

Electing the Howard County Board of Education by districts makes no sense

Yes, this is another post promoting ranked choice voting.

2020-05-15 · 9 min · Frank Hecker

How do schools and parents matter?

I explore the ideas of Judith Rich Harris as they apply to the roles of parents and schools in Howard County and elsewhere.

2019-03-03 · 20 min · Frank Hecker

Online competency-based education

Following up from my previous post on my experience with Coursera, here are a few links of interest (mostly) relating to online education, with a focus on “competency-based education,” i.e., education directed specifically at teaching people to become competent at one or more tasks or disciplines: “Hire Education: Mastery, Modularization, and the Workforce Revolution” (Michelle Weise and Clayton Christensen). Clayton Christensen is famous for his theory of “disruptive innovation,” which I think is useful not so much as a proven theory but rather as a way to structure plausible narratives about business success or failure. When Christensen fails in his predictions it’s usually because he doesn’t pay attention to things that don’t fit neatly into his preferred narratives. For example, he and co-author Michael Horn previously hyped for-profit education companies and failed to see that for many of them actually educating students was not the point. Rather those companies identified a “head I win, tails you lose” business proposition in “chasing Title IV money [i.e., government-subsidized student loans] in a federal financial aid system ripe for gaming.” This represents a second try by Christensen and his associates to forecast the future of post-secondary education. ...

2014-09-28 · 3 min · Frank Hecker